ADMIN: RE: [Advaita-l] Narayana - Word

kalyan chakravarthy kalyan_kc at hotmail.com
Fri May 30 15:25:10 CDT 2003


Namaste Sri Raviji,

Oops.... I am very sorry. I already added two replies today to this thread 
before noticing your mail.

You may remove the two earlier replies given by me from the archives. And 
from my side, the thread ends here.

Thank you for your understanding. And sorry once again if my mails offended 
you or anyone else.

Best Regards
Kalyan


>Respected Sri Kalyanji:
>
>As one of the Administrators of this list, I find your language in
>this post unacceptable.
>
>It is the traditional view that shruti is apaurushheya. R^ishhi-s are
>only mantra drashhTa-s. Language of expression itself may have
>influence of temporal effects in it. That does not imply composition
>by human authors and  the time of seeing the mantra-s does not
>invalidate it or make it inferior. As long as you accept it as shruti,
>you have no choice but accept its apaurushheya aspect and consider its
>validity.
>
>As far as this list is concerned, opinion of the traditional maTha-s,
>such as  Sringeri maTha alone matter and view of indologists are of NO
>importance. Hence, let us base our discussion from that view point.
>
>I hope you understand our position. And I request all the participants
>to end this thread.
>
>Thank you and if I have offended any of you by this post, I apologize
>in advance.
>
>With best wishes,
>
>Ravi
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Rubbish. Have you read the Rig Veda or the Satapata brahmana? Unlike
>Vishnu
> > who was no important God in the Rg Veda samhita, Purusha(Narayana)
>have
> > started their careers as supreme gods. No where is Purusha
>identified with
> > Vishnu in the Rg Veda samhita.
> >
> > You dont even know why the 10th mandala is treated as the later
>mandalas.
> > There is evidece from linguistics. Linguists who have studied the
>evolution
> > of language in depth have told this. All in all it is similar to a
>crime
> > scene investigation where you proceed based on the rules
> >
> > It is not as if the Rg veda is unauthored. Mandalas 2 to 7 which are
> > considered to be  the oldest are called family mandalas as they are
>composed
> > by families of rishis. So much for the nonsense that you talk.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Himalayan holiday! Waiting to be won.
> > http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/summerfun/index.asp Find out more.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > want to unsubscribe or change your options? See:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> > Need assistance? Contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
> >
>
>ambaaL daasan
>
>Ravi
>www.ambaa.org
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Attention NRIs! Send money to India. 
http://server1.msn.co.in/msnleads/citibankrca/citibankrca2.asp Do it in a 
jiffy!



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list