[Advaita-l] Pa~nchapAdikAchArya

[venkata subramanian]

Oh.
   
  i too came to know that one Sundaraman  has written so much against the Holenarsipur school, upholding Bhavavidya.
   
  I dont have this article, but i only have Swamiji's reply to it.  It was published in Triveni magazine so time 50 - 60 years back.
   
  

K Kathirasan NCS <kkathir at ncs.com.sg> wrote:
  Namaste,

There is a dissertation by Martha Doherty, a disciple of Swami Dayananda
Saraswati, on the Avidya debate. I studied the thesis and in my opinion
the arguments were quite weak. She had also cited the 1976 debate. She
took the position of Bhavarupa avidya. 



-----Original Message-----
From: advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
[mailto:advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org] On Behalf Of Anand
Hudli
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:07 AM
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Subject: [Advaita-l] Re: Pa~nchapAdikAchArya

Here is some relevant information. In the book, "lekharatnamAlA-1", a 
collection of articles and lectures by Shri V.S. Ramachandra Sastri, 
published by Vidyanidhi Foundation, Bangalore, 2003, we find an article 
titled "Review of Discussion on Mulavidya", pages 153-169. This article
is 
actually a report on a discussion that took place on February 24 and 25,

1976 at Shankar Math, Bangalore, in the presence of Shri Abhinava 
Vidyatirtha Svaminah and Shri Bharatitirtha Svaminah. The discussion on 
mUlAvidyA took place between scholars of the Sampradaya school
(PakShins) 
and the Karyalaya (VipakShins) and before a panel of arbitrators.

Many points made by the Sampradaya school justify the mUlAvidyA that is 
bhAvarUpA and is the upAdAnakAraNa of the entire dvaitaprapaJNcha. Right
in 
the sUtrabhAShya on tadadhInatvAdarthavat.h, we find
"...parameshvarAdhInA 
tu iyamasmAbhiH jagataH prAgavasthA abhyupagamyate, na svatantratA| ... 
avidyAtmikA hi bIjashaktiH avyaktashabdanirdeshyA parameshvarAshrayA 
mAyAmayI mahAsuShuptiH ... avyaktA hi sA mAyA ..." Also, in the vArtika,
we 
have adhyAsashcha vinA hetuM na loka upapadyate, and asya
dvaitendrajAlasya 
yadupAdAnakAraNam.h, ajnAnaM tadupAshritya brahma kAraNamuchyate.

Thus, "it became absolutely clear that the Bhavarupa Mulavidya, which is
the 
primal cause of saMsAra, given expression to and used in Sastric
parlance by 
mighty men of erudition in the anAdisatsaMpradAya, is entirely in
consonance 
with the bhAshyas and vArtikas accepted by the Vipakshins."

The verdict by arbitrators: The arbitrators decided in favor of the 
sampradAya school, agreeing that in the matter of mUlAvidyA, the cause
of 
saMsAra as accepted in the advaita sampradAya and made clear in the 
prasthanatraya bhAShyas and the vArtikas, the sampradAya view is the
right 
one.

Anand

_________________________________________________________________
Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and more...then map the
best 
route! http://local.live.com?FORM=MGA001

_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org



Thanks & Regards,
Venkat.

Sadgurubhyo Namah.
 		
---------------------------------
Get your email and more, right on the  new Yahoo.com