[Advaita-l] Yoga and Advaita Vedanta - 0

[Ramesh Krishnamurthy]

Namaste Sri Sundar Rajan,

The post #33262 on the advaitin list from which you have quoted below
is actually a classic case of confusing pramana with sadhana and using
phrases such as "direct means" in a very loose sense.

Ramesh

On 25/09/06, Sundar Rajan <avsundarrajan at yahoo.com> wrote:
>   One of the first things to tackle is the 'terminology' - here is as an example of mixing Patanjali Yoga with Nirvikalpa samadhi
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/advaitin/message/33262
>
>   //
>   > 3. Those who talk about Nirvikalpa samadhi as defined in Patanjali
> > Yoga as the direct means of AtmajnAna are at variance with Adi
> > Shankaras teaching because NS or Dhyana is not accepted as a
> > pramAna> by Shankara or any other Acharya.
> >
>   (SR reply):
> First, some clarifications on nomenclature:
>
> Nirvikalpa Samadhi is NOT a term used in Patanjali Yoga sutras and
> linking Nirvikalpa Samadhi to Patanjali causes confusions (IMHO).
> //
>
>   regards
>   Sundar Rajan
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>