[Advaita-l] mithya and maya

Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 5 18:03:31 CST 2009


Dear Sadanandaji,
 
One can see through Mithya only when one has the right knowledge. When one has the knowledge then and then only one can really take Mithya as mithya otherwise it will like learning by a parrot. 
 
Regards,
 
Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

--- On Mon, 1/5/09, kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:

From: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] mithya and maya
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 3:50 PM

>From my understanding:

maayaa is the power by which one appears to be many. The locus of the power is
Iswara. Krishna says - diivam .. mama maayaa - this maaya of mine is divine
origin. 
maaya makes impossible possible - aghaTita ghaTanaa paTiiyasii maayaa - just as
one mind projects multitude of plurality - movable and immovable in the dream
state. That power because of which one appears to be many is maaya. Scripture
equates it to prakRiti - maayantu prakRitin vidyaat - says swetaasvatara
upanishad.

mithyaa is the product of maaya. what I see or perceive is mithyaa - it is
neither sat nor asat - Sat is that which never changes and asat is that which
has no locus for existence.  Whatever I see is changing therefore not sat but
since it is experienced it is not asat. It is called mithyaa - like ring in
comparison to gold, as a worldly example. The whole world is mithyaa since it is
experienced and continuously changing. The power because of which it is seen and
seen as changing is maaya. Taking mityaa as real is delusion. Taking mithyaa as
mithyaa or apparent but not really real is knowledge. 

Hope this helps.

Hari Om!
Sadananda


--- On Mon, 1/5/09, Michael Shepherd <michael at shepherd87.fsnet.co.uk>
wrote:



A respectful request to relate the terms 'mithya' and 'maya' in
relation to
'illusion'..

Which term has the more ancient history in Advaita-Vedanta ?

Do they both have an universal and an individual aspect ?

Personally, I try to 'look through' illusion, and learn from
iignorance...
but it would be good to hear from the wiser !

Michael Shepherd



_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org



      
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org

_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org



      



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list