[Advaita-l] Can a jnAni engage himself in a prohibited act??

[Br. Pranipata Chaitanya]

From: "V Subrahmanian" <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>

> It is not avatara, if you are in that impression.

I repeat do not be judgemental.

You quoted the example, you provided explanation for your example, now you 
are issuing a clarification for your explanation.


>Vyasa's case is no different in as much as another
> body is taken and lived out.  The only difference is that in this case
> avidya / ajnana is not the cause of the new incarnation; it is the command
> of Ishwara.
>

One just cant stop but wonder how nicely you state non-difference and bring 
out difference.

If vandhyA can have putra, I mean cause of the effect, non existing avidya 
can be the cause of the effect prarabdha, in your above cited case.