[Advaita-l] Need information on learning Vedas online

Srirudra srirudra at gmail.com
Wed Aug 21 10:02:05 CDT 2013


Dear Shree Krishna
I will not agree that one can know/understand or even recite the Vedas without knowledge of. Samskrit.You may read the commentaries in different languages but to get the spirit of the Vedic sabdhas Samskrit is a must.Seeing a foreign tongue movie with subtitles in the language you know will not be so satisfying as your understanding the conversations in the language in which the movie is made.R.Krishnamoorthy.

Sent from my iPad

On 21-Aug-2013, at 7:20 AM, Shreekrishna <sumadhwavijaya at gmail.com> wrote:

> SrigurubhyO namaH
> 
> Respected members,
> 
> This is an interesting discussion. I am of the opinion that India is as
> difficult an atmosphere as any other part of the world to pursue
> vaidika-sampradAya in. The ideal jij~jAsu, in my opinion, perhaps couldn't
> care lesser what the world outside is like, insofar as he has created a
> conducive atmosphere for his sAdhana and adhyayana, no matter where he
> lives. Deliberations on how much puNya there is in any AdhyAtmic pursuit
> staying in a land that does not qualify as karmabhUmi is outside the
> purview of this discussion, for as far as the ideal jij~jAsu is concerned,
> puNyArjana should perhaps become an incidental gain enroute to a much
> larger objective (which in some sense is going to be related to something
> pAramArthika). As we do know, IshAvAsya emphasizes - "kurvannEvEha karmANi
> .... ".
> 
> The above said, I am as far from the ideal jij~jAsu as I possibly can be.
> Living in an alien land has its limitations and contributes a wee bit to my
> distance from being an ideal jij~jAsu. Nonetheless, I have found over the
> years, that there are a few more hours in the day that I obtain to invest
> in something less corporeal, as opposed to losing those hours stuck in
> traffic in Indian metros. For me, the journey into the world of vEdAs is a
> both a matter of jij~jAsA and a matter of learning something that in a
> sense is "rightfully/dutifully mine" and passing it on to posterity. It may
> not be entirely inappropriate to state that the number of authoritative
> Sanskrit scholars or shAstra exponents outnumber those who are
> authoritative dvivedins/trivedins. This, by no means, undermines the
> importance of any of these aforementioned sections of the society. I just
> feel that they are very different ballgames, sometimes with very different
> purposes.
> 
> I live in what I could call a hamlet in southeast USA, where the cumulative
> brahmin-by-birth population might not even be quarter-a-century, let alone
> the ones who perform sandhyAvandanam and associated nityakarmas. To some
> like us, who have an ounce of curiosity/interest at this time in life (and
> who knows how life will change) but not the local bandwidth to feel
> satiated, it is just a desire to make hay while the sun shines, that we
> have to resort to non-traditional media to learn vEdAs or shAstrAs. Then
> again, I do chicken out from giving my career and comforts up for learning
> vEdAs at Kashi or Kanchi. So, Skype/GTalk could come to the rescue of some
> of us who populate this weird stranded-at-various-levels space, who really
> want to have the cake and eat it too.
> 
> Finally, I may have to disagree that a knowledge of Sanskrit relieves one
> from the "crutches of translations" based on what really was meant by
> translations, but in the event that they were references to bhAShyas or
> commentaries, it would not be an unfair assessment of the current society
> that there are few who can claim to have understood prasthAnatrayI
> flawlessly without the help of *some* commentary or the other.
> 
> Thanks for your time, suggestions and opinions.
> 
> sarvE bhadrANi pashyantu,
> HarayE namaH
> Shreekrishna.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Rajaram Venkataramani <
> rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I agree.
>> 
>> Is any senior vaidhika in sringeri or any other place protecting vaidhika
>> dharma in traditional manner opposed to learning over skype?
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, Rajaram Venkataramani wrote:
>>> 
>>> RV: What is the reason? As Vedas are sakshat Ishwara and chanting itself
>>>> is
>>>> a great upasana, I thought it is highly desirable to learn Vedas more
>> than
>>>> Sanskrit.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Recitation (svAdhyAya) is important no doubt but the vedas also have a
>>> practical use.  They are not just some super bhajan.  In particular
>>> diligent performance of nitya and naimittika karma is a must for all
>>> Brahmanas.  Thus knowing the mantras and procedure for that is top
>> priority
>>> but after that there are other things.
>>> 
>>> Today everyone and anyone are claiming vedic this and vedic that.  There
>>> is so much bad information out there (E.g. this Vidushekhara Bhattacharya
>>> affair.) and it is less likely ou will be misled by the unscrupulous if
>> you
>>> are well-informed.  This is a particular concern for those who are
>> isolated
>>> from the astika community whether insider bharat or outside.
>>> 
>>> Also if we are going to be established outside of Vedic cultures
>>> traditional environment (again in India or outside) we need to build up a
>>> proper infrastructure to ensure our continued progress.  Too many times
>>> I've seen people get overenthusiastic, bite off more than they can chew
>> and
>>> then flame out.  And n particular we who are parents need to be literate
>> so
>>> we can ensure our children are dharmically literate.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The latter is no doubt important to learn especially to access
>>>> literatures that have not been translated properly or to understand the
>>>> explanations.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> As you increase your sanskrit knowledge, you will find translations to be
>>> crutches you can increasingly do without.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.**org/archives/advaita-l/<
>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/>
>>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.**culture.religion.advaita<
>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita>
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.**org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l<
>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l>
>>> 
>>> For assistance, contact:
>>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> 
>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> 
>> For assistance, contact:
>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ಸಕಲ ಸಾಧನವೆನಗೆ ಕೈ ಸೇರಿತು, ಮುಕುತಿಯ ಸಾಧನಕೆ ತುಸುವು ಬಾರದ ಧನವು!
> - ಶ್ರೀಮದ್ವಾದಿರಾಜರು
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> 
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> 
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list