[Advaita-l] Shankara and DrishTi-SrishTi vAda - eka jeeva vaada

[V Subrahmanian]

Any work that teaches Brahman Atman moksha etc is essentially bases on
Shruti only.  With this as basis alone it  delves on yukti etc.
On May 25, 2016 11:21 AM, "Praveen R. Bhat via Advaita-l" <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Namaste Chandramouliji,
>
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:28 PM, H S Chandramouli <
> hschandramouli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Reg  << Shruti-based logic, that is, based on उपपत्ति लिङ्ग among the
> > षड्लिङs used for the तात्पर्यनिर्णय of the Shruti.>>,
> >
> >
> >
> > That is just my query.  All the षड्लिङs (SaDlinGa)  must be used for
> > तात्पर्यनिर्णय (tAtparyanirNaya ) of the Shruti. But here only the
> उपपत्ति
> > लिङ्ग (upapatti linga)  among the षड्लिङs (SaDlinGa)  is used for the
> > तात्पर्यनिर्णय (tAtparyanirNaya ) of the Shruti. That leads to my query.
> >
> >
> >
> My reply was in the context of the point of contention made by you earlier,
> which was that the logic is used here is like other darShanas, that is
> without Shruti-basis, whereas I said that it is Shruti-based logic since
> Shruti uses this लिङ्ग among the six. It is a different matter whether the
> author of the work chose to use only one or few of the Shruti- लिङ्गs to
> explain a प्रक्रिया. And that by itself need not take away the fact that it
> is based on Shruti.
>
> praNAm,
> --Praveen R. Bhat
> /* Through what should one know That owing to which all this is known!
> [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>