[Advaita-l] is this jagat mithyA ?? Sri SSS

[H S Chandramouli]

>
> In continuation to my previous post, the following passage from the
> commentary by Sri SSS on BSB is also relevant.  It may be accessed at the
> following link.
>
>
>
> <<
> http://www.adhyatmaprakasha.org/php/bookreader/templates/book.php?type=kannada&book_id=101A_2&pagenum=0001#page/16/mode/1up
> >>,
>
>
>
> Page 6, para 7, last few lines.  I am translating it here.
>
>
>
> << But Vedanta Sidhanta states that only atman is satya, rest is all
> anruta/mithya/appearences perceived by people having wrong knowledge >>
>
>
>
> << anAtma, which appears in some states subservient to Atman who is
> jnAnaswarUpa, is asatya/mithyA/anruta. >>.
>
>
>
> << “  anruta is mithya “ does not mean that it does not appear at all. It
> is not different from Atman. It does not have independent Existence. Looked
> at carefully, it is Atman only. This is the meaning.  This should always be
> borne in mind when encountering terms like mithyA/anruta etc. >>.
>
>
>
> Regards
>

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>