Jaldhar H. Vyas
jaldhar at BRAINCELLS.COM
Fri Nov 15 10:34:10 CST 1996
> From: Ms. Aikya Param <aikya at IX.NETCOM.COM>
> To: Multiple recipients of list ADVAITA-L <ADVAITA-L at TAMU.EDU>
> Subject: Re: JIVA-MAN
> Date: Thursday, November 14, 1996 2:09 PM
> So what are the swamis doing? They are official renunciates. If they
> are eating and travelling and teaching and accepting donations and build-
> ing ashrams and publishing books, is this some new class of karma that
> doesn't happen in the world but on some other plane of existence but we
> see it, hear it and get annoyed with it if they are also having romantic
> with the ladies?
Instad of speculating as to what is karma and what isn't, why don't you
take a look at the dharmashastras. What a sannyasi can and cannot do is
clearly delimited therein.
> If one cannot attain brahmaGYaanam.h and continue one's worldly life,
> what are we saying about Lord Krishna and Lord Rama? Were they both
> ignorant? Pardon me but they were both very involved in their worldly
> roles as soldier/king (Krishna) and Heir Apparent and then King (Raama).
An avatar is an amsha of Bhagavan so their situation is hardly the same as
a normal human being.
> In the west we don't have a sannyaas option the way there is in India.
> not quite the same thing to join the ranks of the homeless as it is to
> ranks of the sadhus in India. Sanyaas is a lifestyle option within a
> system which also supports those who choose it. It has clear legal and
> religious definitions.
Of course we have a sannyasa option in the west. It may take more effort
and you may not have the willpower to pursue it but that's your problem
not the Wests.
> This knowledge has gone beyond those India. It's important to look
> at what is the intention, the idea behind these social forms referred to
> in these texts..
Our Dharma is refered to as Sanatan or eternal. It is completely valid in
any place and any time.
> Also, it may help if people remember that Shankara was writing for a
> of swamis often so he could make his comments in support of the lifesyle
> they all had adopted. He was perfectly clear that karma, including
> doesn't produce the paramaatma in a person.
True, just being a sannyasi doesn't guarantee Moksha but not being a
Sannyasi guarantees you won't acheive Moksha.
> To be a normal. well balanced successful person anywhere doing anything
> requires renunciation. That is my observation after thirty months
> intensive study with Swami Dayananda at Sandeepany West in Piercy, CA
> and now fourteen years "in the world". It seemed to me that our ashram
> Piercy CA, funded by the hard earned money of Chinmaya Mission
> members was very much in the world as well. We bought vegetables, did
> cooking, maintained the cars the grounds and the buildings, get along
> each other or didn't get along with each other. Seemed just like "the
Sounds like the world to me too. Doesn't sound like Vedanta though.
Jaldhar H. Vyas [jaldhar at braincells.com] I will choose.-_|\ free will
Consolidated Braincells Inc. / \
http://www.braincells.com/jaldhar/ -)==Perth=Amboy=>*.--._/ o-
"Witty quote" - Dead Guy v McQ!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list