Sankara SampradhAyam - 1

Dr. S.R.Marur smarur at EASI.SOFT.NET
Fri Aug 6 03:55:00 CDT 1999


The advaitins who follow srI Adi Sankara Bagawadh pAda, are known by
the name - smArthAs. Nowadys, many smArtha youngsters are unaware of
this
[*smArthA*] title. They refer themselves as 'Iyer' only!

VaishnavAs or vishistAdhvaitins are known as IyengArs. Dvaitins are
addressed as Raojis - i.e. they attach Rao or AchAr as their surnames.
As they follow srI MadhwAchArya, we call them as mAdhwAs. They also
are devotees of Vishnu. But, whenever we come across the term
'vaishnavAs', we tend asscociate that only with the followers of
RamAnujA's siddhAntha. As mAdhwa's have 'AchAr' as their surname,
srI vaishnavAs also have 'AchAryAr' as surname. They have two variations

in this, such as 'Raja gOpAla IyEngAr' and 'Raja gOpAlAchAryAr'.

As the mAdhwAs are widely known based on the name of srI MadhwAchArya,
the followers of srI Sankara or srI Ramanuja are not known to be
referred to by the names of their respective achAryAs. The term
'SankarAdvaitin' may be present in some English philosophy book;
may float in lectures, but not in vogue in day-to-day life. In practice,

we commonly have dvaitins as Raos, vishistAdvaitins as IyengArs and
advaitins as Iyers.

Generally, smArthAs alone have shAsthry, sharma etc. as their surname.
Even those who have 'dhIkshidhar' as their surname are invariably a
small segment of smArthAs in our region. [*PeriyavA is referring to
Tamil Nadu*]. The title of dhIkshithar is awarded to one who conducts
yagAs and to his family. (The case of dhIkshidhar of Chidhambaram is
quite different). In general, advaitins consider themselves as those
belonging to Iyer subsect. We, thus, conclude based on the surname in
vogue. [* ie Iyer].

This generation doesn't use the subsect as surname. This has become a
taboo! Even in the previous generation, others didn't employ the subsect

name as much as Raojis did. If we go a generation or two backwards, we
can conclude that we are grandson(s) of either an Iyer or IyengAr or a
Raoji. Even those who had 'AchAr' as surname, did not refer to
themselves
as those belonging to 'AchAr subsect' - they referred themselves only
as Raos or mAdhwAs. Similarly, vaishnavAs with 'AchAryAr' surname,
don't refer themselves as belonging to AchAryAr subsect - but consider
themselves as IyengArs only! [*We*] smArthAs refer ourselves as Iyers:
not as those belonging to sharmA subsect or shAsthry subsect.

As much as followers of srI Sankara Bhagawad pAda are not aware of their

being smArthAs, [*they*] are equally unaware of another important fact!
The fact that [*Adi*] AchArya hasn't identified any particular deity as
an exclusively chosen one for them and instead advocated to view all of
them equally [*with equal veneration*] is not known even to many
advaitins.
Thinking that [*Adi*] AchArya has chosen Parama Sivan as their
'upAsanA mUrthy', they identify themselves as Saivaites. There appears
to be a reason for this line of thinking.

Both dvaitins and vishistAdvaitins are followers (upAsakAs) of Vishnu.
It appears that the smArthAs of today who happened to be advaitins,
consider themselves to be saivaites as they differ from the other two
subsects. But, this reasoning is wrong.

Iyer, IyengAr or Rao are not sanskrit names. Hence, when an IyengAr
refers to his subsect, he introduces himself as a vaishnava; Raoji
does as a mAdhwA. There is nothing wrong in their [*such*]
identification. But, only this Iyer who happened to be an advaitin,
refers to himself as a 'saivaite'. Even others seem to hold this
wrong notion!

Even I'm considered to be a saivaite AchAryA by many. A professor
from Japan (Hajme Nakamura) had come to me. He said, "I've studied
[*Adi*] AchAryAl's sUtra bhAshyam, gIta bhAshyAm etc. In all of them,
only advaita is elaborated but no mention had been made at all about
Siva" and asked me "How is that you remain a Saivaite ?"

I asked him back, "On what basis do you consider me a saivaite?".
He replied,"You are wearing only vibhUthi? You are doing Shiva
pUja (Chandhra moUlIswara pUja). All other ShankarAchAryAs are also
happened to be saivaites like this. When [*Adi*] AchAryA hasn't found
any bhEdha between Shiva and Vishnu, why is that you and those of
other Shankara MathAs wear saivaite symbols and do Shiva pUja?"

I answered him [*thus*].

                                    .... to continue

Regards,

Sudhakar

----------------------------------------------------------------
Translated from,
HH Sri Chandhra sEkharEndhra Saraswathi Swamiji, 'Sankara
SampradhAyam'. Deivathin Kural (in Tamil), Vol. II, Second
Edition, ed. rA. Ganapathi, Vanathi padhippagam, Chennai,
pp: 119-157 (1980).
-----------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list