Advaita and Christianity

[Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian]

<Vaidya_Sundaram at I2.COM> wrote:

> about?  To me "study" by itself has no meaning unless you say "a
study of
> something" + "with some thing". With vedanta, the "study of vedanta"
is the
> study of vedanta *with vedanta* !! If not, what do you study vedanta
> "with"? If then it is said that the study is "with vedanta" - then
what is
> the study "of" ? If the "of" means Brahman, how did you know what to
study
> if the vedanta did not tell you about it (brahman)? How do you read
a
> bigger (or deeper) meaning into a work as grand and as big as the
vedas
> themselves with out taking its words (i.e. vedanta which is also
part of
> the vedas) literally? Hence, to me atleast, this "philosophy of the
> philosophy" argument is going nowhere.

[much excellent stuff deleted]

Thanks Vaidya, for the excellent mail. I couldn't have put it with as
much clarity.

Rama

--
bhava shankara deshikame sharaNam

Archives : http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l.html
Help     : Email to listmaster at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Options  : To leave the list send a mail to
           listserv at lists.advaita-vedanta.org with
           SIGNOFF ADVAITA-L in the body.