iishaa vaasyaM ...
S. V. Subrahmanian
svs_shankara at HOTMAIL.COM
Fri Jul 21 08:46:51 CDT 2000
Shri Charlesji wrote:
Oh it's a fair question. Bear in mind that the scriptures are
for the ignorant, not the realised (see BG 2:46), so reading
the first sentence as an injunction is quite valid. There are
those who would say "A rose is a rose is a rose", whereas a
rose is in fact an upAdhi of the Lord; and this injunction is
a means to remember that, so that one does not take the upAdhi
to be real, covet it, and forget the Lord.
Response:
Even though you were answering Shri Raviji, you have touched upon a point I
mentioned about. Thanks for your correction. I take it.
Regards.
S. V. Subrahmanian.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
--
bhava shankara deshikame sharaNam
Archives : http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l.html
Help : Email to listmaster at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Options : To leave the list send a mail to
listserv at lists.advaita-vedanta.org with
SIGNOFF ADVAITA-L in the body.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list