brahmavid=Krishna

[Srikrishna Ghadiyaram]

Hari Om !!

--- Kiran B R <kiranbr at ROCKETMAIL.COM> wrote:
> > That question is not even under debate, Kiran. As
> > for whether brahman does
> > control worldly reality, your tests are not the
> way
> > to go. Shruti and the
> > teachers of Vedanta have much to tell us about
> > brahman and reality. That is
> > enough.
>
> Not for me, unfortunately.
>
> > As far as your argument is concerned, I just
> > showed why it is
> > meaningless, regardless of whether brahman
> controls
> > worldly reality or not.
> >
>
> It is not meaningless whether he controls or not.
> Was
> Krishna's ability to cause an eclipse during the
> Kurukshetra war meaningless? Was Narasimha's ability
> to emerge from a pillar meaningless? Or is that all
> nonsense in the Shrutis?

All is meaningful, except your understanding of the
mening of 'brahmavid brahmaiva bhavati'.

Om Namo Narayanaya !!

Srikrishna

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com