brahmavid=Krishna

[Kiran B R]

--- Vidyasankar <vsundaresan at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
> >> teachers of Vedanta have much to tell us about
> >> brahman and reality. That is
> >> enough.
> >
> >Not for me, unfortunately.
>
> So the absurd tests like running 100 m in 2s or
> freezing water by boiling
> are more reliable?
>

Yes!

"Believe not because some old manuscripts are
produced, believe not because it is your national
belief, because you have been made to believe it from
your childhood; but reason it all out, and after you
have analysed it, then, if you find that it will do
good to one and all, believe it, live up to it, and
help others to live up to it"

-Gauthama Buddha.


> >It is not meaningless whether he controls or not.
> Was
> >Krishna's ability to cause an eclipse during the
> >Kurukshetra war meaningless? Was Narasimha's
> ability
> >to emerge from a pillar meaningless? Or is that all
> >nonsense in the Shrutis?
>
> Ah, that was out of his own desire or out of the
> fruition of karma, not
> because somebody asked for it.
> ...There
> is a world of difference between what you propose
> and what the legends say.
>

Whether it was out of his own desire or someone else's
desire, do you accept that he has the capability to do
it? Yes or No? That is all I am asking!

Dhanyavaad
Kiran

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com