[Advaita-l] RE: Ananda, Chaitanya

[Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian]

Some of them do have aananda, though not at the end, e.g.,
saccidaananda bhaaratii. Since aananda is not a da"sanaamii suffix,
perhaps it is not taken at the end by traditional da"sanaamii
sanyaasins. aananda has probably been popularized by the RK Mission,
Chinmaya mission, etc.

The suffix aa"srama also nominally come under "s.r.ngeri, but no
aacaarya in the "s.r.ngeri list has that as the title. Most in the
list seemed to be bhaaratii, followed by tiirtha. A couple of giris
and only one aara.nya.

Rama

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 23:54:57 -0700 (PDT), venkata subramanian
<venkat_advaita at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the information.
> 
> There is a booklet by name - Greatness of Sringeri published by Tatvaloka.
> 
> in one of the editions i saw that the title for Samnyasa at Sringeri is chiefly Bharathi, Saraswathi, Aranya.
> 
> the issue is how come Ananda is added ?   Ananda is not one of the 10.  it rather suffices everyone.
> 
> then, why None of the titles of the 36 Acharyas of Sringeri has the ephitet Ananda.