[Advaita-l] Re: itihAsa purANa in the bR^ihadAraNyaka
Jaldhar H. Vyas
jaldhar at braincells.com
Fri Jul 28 22:54:21 CDT 2006
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian wrote:
> I was able to locate the shAyaNa bhAShya, where he says:
> brAhmaNAni - karmacodanA.h "vAyavyAgm shvetamAlabheta"
> The brAhmaNa (passages) are the ones impelling action such as "place
> the white (animal?) in the northwest direction" (?)
That the important Vedic statements are those that impell action (vidhi)
is the standard Mimamsaka party line. "offer a white animal to Vayu" is
also a stock Mimamsaka example of a vidhi. So he seems to be saying
Brahmana = vidhi.
> itihAsA - mahabhAratAdayaH
> The itihAsas are mahAbhArata and the rest. Note: the plural being used
> he seems to have in mind the rAmAyaNa and at least one another since
> the plural and not dual is used.
> purANAni - brahmANDAdIni
> The purANas are the brahmANDa and the rest
I think a better translation would be "including upto Brahmanda". See
> yadva "devaasuraa.h sa.myattaa aasan" ityaadaya.h itihaasaa.h
> ****Or it could mean**** Passages such as "The devas and asuras were
> prepared for war" (emphasis mine)
> "AtmA vA idameka evAgra aasiinnAnyatki.mcana miShat" - ityaadi
> sR^iShTyAdi pratipAdakAni purANAni
> Teachings of creation, etc., such as "The Atman was alone existing in
> the begnning, nothing else blinked" are the purANas
So in this case, itihasa-purana = the Mimamsaka category of arthavada.
> So it appears there were two conflicting opinions among the
> traditional school on the meaning of purANas and itihAsas when
> referred to in the veda. Actually shAyaNa, if mentions his preference
> first (as seems likely by his use of yadvA), seems to be in tune with
> Sureshvara and not Shankara.
Isn't it interesting that Sureshvaracharya is held to have been an
ex-Mimamsaka (even by those who don't agree with the identification with
> It is interesting that shAyaNa thinks that the archetypal purANa
is > the brahmANDa, just like the bhArata is the archetypal itihAsa.
Rather I think he is merely recollecting the traditional shlokas that
name the 18 mahapuranas.
brAhmaM pAdmaM vaiShNavaM cha shivaM bhAgavataM tatha |
tathanyannAradIyaM cha mArkaNDeyaM cha saptamaM ||
AgneyaM aShTamaM proktaM bhaviShyannavamaM tathA |
dashamaM brahmavaivartaM lingamekAdashaM tathA ||
vArAhaM dvAdashaM proktaM skAndaM chAtra trayodashaM |
chaturdasham vAmanaM cha kaurmaM pa~nchadashaM tathA ||
mAtysaM cha garuDaM chaiva brAhmANDAShTAdashaM tathA ||
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list