[Advaita-l] the verb "to be"

[Haresh Bakshi]

namaste, "to be" is non-dualistic; noticing "to be" is dualistic.

dhanyavaadaH |
Haresh.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Marko Gregoric <markogregori at gmail.com>wrote:

> Namaste
>
> The verb *to be* needs (for its correct functioning) an *object* *which
> is*or
> *which is not* and a subject which can tell so. So  in my opinion we have
> here the very seed of duality.
>
> Would somebody agree on this?
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>



-- 
Haresh.

--------------------------------------------
Haresh Bakshi
http://www.SoundOfIndia.com
--------------------------------------------