[Advaita-l] the verb "to be"

[Haresh Bakshi]

namaste, the noticer of "to be" has no property of being or non-being; but
the
act of noticing has the property of being when noticing is taking place, and
has
the property of non-being when the act of noticing ceases.

Whether noticing takes place or not, the noticer always "is" -- eternally
the
Present Tense of "to be".

In other words, the Experiencer is not the same as the experience. And, the
Experiencer always "is" -- whether the Existence is noticed as an experience

or not.

dhanyavaadaH namaste cha |
Haresh.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Marko Gregoric <markogregori at gmail.com>wrote:

> Why? The "noticer" of "to be" has no property of being or not-being.
>
> Thanks for your answer!
>
> Marko
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>



-- 
Haresh.

--------------------------------------------
Haresh Bakshi
http://www.SoundOfIndia.com
--------------------------------------------