[Advaita-l] Discussion on the "Knowledge and the Means of Knowledge"

[kuntimaddi sadananda]

--- prem d p <prem_d_p at yahoo.co.in> wrote:


>   The point i was trying to make is that the temptation to
>   treat the misapprehension of snake as direct and immediate (though
>   of the illusory kind) is perhaps wrong. 
>    

Prem - praNams 

Vedanta ParibhASha will address the errors in perception in the later sections and
when we come to that section we can resolve this issue. In the first post itself we
have clarified the pramaa, the valid knowledge is only related to vyAvahArika satyam
only since non-negatability criteria if you apply all the way to absolute level only
thing left non-negatable is  paramArthika which is in the absolute sense aprameyam.
This has been clarified in the post 1 in defining pramANa. 

Hari Om!
Sadananda