[Advaita-l] Pancikarana vs. Trivrtkarana (analysis)

[Dr. Yadu Moharir]

Dear Bhadraiah-Ji
 
The name "romasha" as mentioned is correct.
 
This suukta is known as "svanaya daanasuti".  R^iShii for this suukta is kaxiivat aushija,  King full name is given as "svanaya bhavayavya" and chhanda for the reference R^ichaa 6 & 7 is anuShTubh.  
 
Regards,
 
Dr. Yadu

--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Bhadraiah Mallampalli <vaidix at hotmail.com> wrote:


From: Bhadraiah Mallampalli <vaidix at hotmail.com>
Subject: [Advaita-l] Pancikarana vs. Trivrtkarana (analysis)
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 11:01 AM





The word romasha is suspect in the first place. 



If something (hair in private parts) can not be explained by Shruti that becomes not_Brahman right? Can such a thing exist?



Regards

Bhadraiah

_________________________________________________________________
Quick access to your favorite MSN content and Windows Live with Internet Explorer 8. 
http://ie8.msn.com/microsoft/internet-explorer-8/en-us/ie8.aspx?ocid=B037MSN55C0701A
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org