[Advaita-l] Conference on that Date of Adi Sankaracharya in October, 2002

[Anbu sivam2]

Why would that have to be so conditional?  Did I not say that the devotees
stay out of the question and let the Swamiji's settle among themselves if it
is important for them.



On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:14 AM, S Jayanarayanan <sjayana at yahoo.com> wrote:

> --- On Tue, 1/5/10, Anbu sivam2 <anbesivam2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > When will people understand that only Gurus are important
> > but not their
> > matams.  Why is it so important to establish the
> > seniority question?  For
> > what end?
> >
>
> If you really think that the "seniority question" is unimportant, shall we
> assume that you have absolutely no problems in accepting that the Kanchi
> Math is actually a sub-Math of the Sringeri Math, and the claimed lineage of
> Kanchi is false?
>
> Regards,
> Kartik
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>