[Advaita-l] Jnana and ajnana (Bhakti vs. Jnana)
Rajaram Venkataramani
rajaramvenk at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 06:57:38 CDT 2011
As you propose that it is okay to call nyaya (whole) as tarka (a part), I
suggest you call your style of nyaya as vitanda (another part). I will call
style of nyaya as vada (another part). ha ha ha.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:13 AM, V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Rajaram Venkataramani <
> rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > It is totally fallacious to say that advaita acharyas used minimum use of
> > nyaya (which FYI is different to tarka) and mainly for polemics.
> >
>
> Having confirmed with Vidwan Mani Dravid Sastrigal I would like to inform
> that the terms 'tarka' and 'nyAya' are two words to denote the same system.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ny%C4%81ya_S%C5%ABtras
>
> //The Nyaya is sometimes called Tarka-Vidyā or the Science of Debate,
> Vāda-Vidyā or the Science of Discussion. Tarka is the special feature of
> the
> Nyāya. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ny%C4%81ya_S%C5%ABtras#cite_note-2>//
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/avygravy/the-nyaya-system-of-indian-philosophy
>
> *//Nyaya* Vidya or *Tarka* Sastra.//
>
> Regards,
> subrahmanian.v
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list