[Advaita-l] Can a mithyA-vastu produce an effect? असत्यवस्तुनः अर्थक्रियाकारित्वम्

[Praveen R. Bhat]

Hari OM,


Simple. Because veda didn't prescribe it as an  alternative of soma.
>

Precisely so; its not because everything is in everything, but only because
veda says what is an alternative to soma.

Because the defect of eye is not able to reveal gold, etc.
>
>
Again, not because everything is in everything but the defect of the eye (as
per vishishTa advaita as I understand from the above) reveals one thing
instead of the other. It can't surely be both.


praNAm,
--Praveen R. Bhat
/* Through what should one know That owing to which all this is known!
[Br.Up. 4.5.15] */