[Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva of Vedas.

[kuntimaddi sadananda]

--- On Wed, 9/14/11, श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 09:33, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> Moreover, if
> you are not good enough to counter the question, you could have avoided
> the 'stamped declarations' & some sarcastic remarks like below :
>
> (a) OK. So, snake is true for you. Great.
> (b)Don't take name of revered texts to hide your misunderstanding.
> (c) The distinction should be understood between prama and bhrama.
>

Read portion of his post and then my post. You will be able to understand
the cause of my comments.
If you can't then I can't do anything more.

I can't exhaust myself anymore.


---------------
Sriman - with all due respects, I did study your post and frankly I do agree with Shree Bhaskarji comments in this regard. I was letting it go without making any further comments since I find a dead end, and was even surprised that shree Bhaskarji made the comment. 
 
In principle if I say something wrong with a post, but I cannot explain it, and others who have not expressed their opinion can explain it, then obviously there is something wrong in my statement. I have no interst in finding fault with anybody but if I am wrong in my understanding, I must know. 

If anyone else could find fault with the pratyaksha pramANa aspect that I mentoned and that Shreeman shreemallalitaalaalitaH says he finds it wrong but could not explain it what that is, I will be more than happy to know, since I have been examining the epistemological issues for some time and for that reason only studied Vedanta Paribhaasha and writing critical analysis of it. 

Hari Om!
Sadananda