[Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva of Vedas.

[kuntimaddi sadananda]

Let that be so
 
Hari Om!
Sadananda



--- On Wed, 9/14/11, श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com> wrote:


From: श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva of Vedas.
To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011, 6:43 PM


*श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <http://www.lalitaalaalitah.com>
lalitAlAlitaH <http://about.me/lalitaalaalitah/bio>*



On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:04, kuntimaddi sadananda <
kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Sir - abaadhita is already implied in the very pramANa definition. Thanks
> for pointing out that I missed to restate again.
>

To be clear, I was pointing that apauruSheyatva is needed for veda to be
pramANa and nothing else.
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org