[Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva of Vedas.

[srinivasan krishnamoorthy]

i dont think i need to respond for such acrimonius a bit boisterous and a
bit poisonous provocative , inciting and irritating  and exciting reply too
,as if the world is only for vedantins and scholars....rebuking and barking
on every sentence instead of admiring and correcting ....authoritatively
arrogant can not be the attitude of pundits,scholars and imposters....the
teachings of  "BajaGovindam" is lost in the wind with people like u ...am
sorry to say...that however great you are ....a pundit , a scholar, a
vedantin, or anything else, nothing travels ultimately during the Jiva
Journey to Brahmatvam....that is my gutsy feeling....you  might have or
delberately attacked me with your scintillating choicy words but you have
attacked only my body and  senses and not beyond that including my
intellect....i thought the intellectuals are fully accomplished persons  but
unfotunately you have prooved the other way about it...thanks i dont need to
respond and i resign form this membership of advaita fourm..which spoils the
the very purpose of my joining....good riddens for me....better to be in the
company of idiots and fools than arrogant pseudo intellectuals....
your explanation of :


We know what advaitam is and what it needs to achieve.---- am sure how you
are belittling the GREAT ADI.SHANKARACHARYA.... let me better stop at this
.

"Dharmo Rakshati Rakshataka " if you protect Dharma , then Dharma will
protect you ...
hence, please dont ever even attack others by your prowess on literature.and
vedanta
..is not intended for that ....LET GOD PUNISH THOSE WHO ARE ARROGANT TO THE
CORE..... thanks and bye but please do take care of your health.....dont
allow the blood to gush down your throat....with fire.....be cool as a
cucumber......sorry if i had hurt you unknowingly as am only an idiot in
your parlance ...thanks for the compliments....god bless.....

2011/9/15 श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com>

> *श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <http://www.lalitaalaalitah.com>
> lalitAlAlitaH <http://about.me/lalitaalaalitah/bio>*
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:27, srinivasan krishnamoorthy <
> ksri2006 at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > i dont
> > think Adi.shankara has made us to indulge in such kind of argumentative
> > explanations
>
>
> This is your thinking. We know him otherwise.
> He doesn't want us to indulge us in 'useless arguments' .
> And we are definitely not in any useless thing.
>
>
> > ...this is the case only with scholars...
>
>
> So, what do idiots do.
>
>
> > and not with
> > commoners....
>
>
> Commoners always blame scholars, because they can't understand them.
>
>
> > which will ultimately bring nothing but sheer dis-satisfaction
> >
>
> Just to people like you.
>
>
> > and am ok u r not ok philosophy...deviating from the primrose path of
> > Adi.shankars advaitam...
>
>
> We know what advaitam is and what it needs to achieve.
> We need not learn it from a 'commoner'.
> How could a layman expect to teach correct path to specialists ?
>
>
> > learned are those who make  too much noises about
> > nothing...
>
>
> Actually you failed to grasp subject of our 'noise'. We were making noise
> about apauruSheyatvam and not about 'nothing'.
>
>
> > and the ignorant are those of  six minus six who make revered and
> > silent approach in following the enshrined principles without questioning
> > the authority of adi.shankara..or vedas ..
>
>
> We can see your silence but it was out of reverence or ignorance is not
> determined, even when you are telling.
>
>
> > its not that they are not capable
> > of attaining any brilliance but the brilliants are the one who always
> spun
> > and shy away their efforts in knowing the Brahmatvam...
>
>
> Then please maintain your silence. Don't break it ever again.
>
>
> > am one such am not
> > highly qualified philosopher, or a scholar or a samskrit pundit as many
> > pose
> > to be here
>
>
> Yea, you are a commoner, I remember.
> You are great. You know that others are posing. I smell same with you. You
> are posing as greater than scholars.
>
>
> > ... to share my views...atleast am interested in knowing about
> > what is not known to me hiterto...
>
>
> You don't know about pramANa, prAmANya, apauruSheyatva, etc. and their
> importance in vedAnta and sha~Nkara's view.
>
>
> > would you all give me an opportunity to
> > learn more about advaitam
>
>
> Are you forcing us to teach you ?
> We don't teach a person who just utters anything and understands nothing.
>
>
> > than indulging and wasting time on such frivolous
> > arguements on  aparusheyatvam ...
>
>
> Don't ever try to waste time of scholars here with you useless words.
> We better know what to do and what to not.
>
>
> > to say simply....Brahamsatyam JagnMithya,
> > Jivo Brahmaiva na aparah... !!! is just sufficient to understand the
> > divinity in this life ....
>
>
> So, you have understood and taught us.
> And you were posing to learn something from us.
> See problems with in you.
>
> I've to say one thing specially for you :
> Keep away from such discussions and don't read them. We like minded people
> know value of discussion and sha~Nkara too. We enjoy explaining his view
> and
> testing his every statement. We are definitely not forcing you to read and
> be disturbed.
> And always remember that it's a discussion group of advaita vedAnta
> according to veda-s and sha~Nkara. We have no interest in discussing
> according to you.
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>