[Advaita-l] Vikalpa, Savikalpa, and Nirvikalpa
srirudra at vsnl.com
Wed Aug 22 11:03:56 CDT 2012
Dear Sri Sadananda
In Upadesa Sahasri Sri Acharya refutes the Vaiseshika doctrine-which does
not admit of Self/Athman- of Kanada -slokas51-66-.Whether Nyaayavaisheshika
which you have referred to is altogether a different
----- Original Message -----
From: "kuntimaddi sadananda" <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta"
<advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Vikalpa, Savikalpa, and Nirvikalpa
PraNAms - In NyaayavaisheShika, vikalpa method is used as a method in the
arguments by providing possible choices for purvapashi's statement and
refuting each of choices thereby dismissing the original statement as
invalid. in that sense vikalpa is a choice, which shree Vidyaranya plays on
that term to refute the Nayya philosophy itself as anyaaya in Ch.1 - tatva
viveka in sloka 49-50,( I think).
From: V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>
>A: The absence of awareness of the distinction of the seer, the seen and
>the act of seeing is indeed its special characteristic. The Atman is
>clearly perceived. Further, supreme bliss is experienced.
Implication of the above statement that has the words - perceived -
experienced - I would understand the distinctions of seer-seen-seeing or
tripuTi are understood as mithyaa with clear understanding of the self that
I am is the substantive of all without any above distinctions and supreme
bliss is the nature of the divisionless state - as though - experienced
since it is the self that I am which is aparoksham or direct and immediate.
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list