[Advaita-l] Advaiti Response to this report?

[Rajaram Venkataramani]

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Rajaram Venkataramani wrote:
>
> The arguments by Sri Venkatesh may lack both understanding of Advaita and
>> strong arguments by the other schools of thought against advaitam. However,
>> I do not think the thread should be closed because one has to start enquiry
>> somewhere and discuss to arrive at the conclusions of the sastras.
>>
>
> During the course of this thread he was given several suggestions on where
> to start enquiry.  Beginners should start with the basics and firm up their
> own understanding before they start worrying about answering others.
>
>
> Rajaram: For that one should understand that one is a beginner which
> members of academia and other schools dont. I too thought I understood
> advaitam. Thanks to the patient clarifications by the members on this list
> online and offline (Sri Subrahamian and Sri Devanathan), I understood I
> dont. Now, I got a structured learning path from Sri Mani Dravid
> Sastrigal. The purpose of the list to help people learn advaitam and any
> action should aim to achieve that. I dont see how stopping a discussion
> will.
>
 --
> Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
>  ______________________________**_________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.**org/archives/advaita-l/<http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/>
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.**culture.religion.advaita<http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita>
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.**org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l<http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l>
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>