[Advaita-l] Apoureshyatva - Faith or Logic?
rajaramvenk at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 12:17:39 CDT 2012
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Vidyasankar Sundaresan <
svidyasankar at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > The whole problem comes because we assume that rishis are historical
> personalities and the mantra revealed by them did not exist before their
> time. This is not the Mimamsa position as far as I understand their terse
> logic. According to their logic, the mantras are eternal and passed down
> through oral tradition. The names of rishis mentioned are common nouns. The
> historical persons are proper nouns and they get the name because of
> interpreting them.
> > I will leave it to Sri Vidyasankar as he seems to think that the mantras
> were unknown before the rishis revealed them.
> Unknown to whom? They were certainly known to whoever/whatever revealed
> to the Rshi who then passed it on to us.
> You seem to be misrepresenting my position. To say that a Rshi lived in
> time and that
> he or she revealed some portion of the veda to mankind does not imply the
> prior non-
> existence of what was revealed. I've never implied anything of the sort,
> even remotely.
> In fact, as a vedAntin, I don't accept prAg-abhAva. As a scientist, I
> don't accept that
> something can come out of nothing. I should have thought that this is
> obvious to all.
> RV: In my understanding, your position is that the rishis were historical
> persons and revealed the mantras at t = t1, t = t2 etc. Before that the
> Vedas were in manifest / unmanifest form co-existent with Ishwara. In your
> position, some injunctions will be unknown to mankind at the time between
> t1 and t2. So, such injunctions cannot operate in that time (as per the
> razor sharp argument put forward by sringeri acharya). As per my
> understanding, the sabda is eternal. It manifested in Brahma's heart at t =
> t0 (like he got pratyaksha etc.) exactly as it was done in the previous
> cycle. This contained the names of all the rishis and the mantras
> attributed to them. This was passed on to the followers of pravrtti and
> nivrtti margas. We think that the rishis appeared in history based
> on incorrect anumana as we cannot tell the time period of the rishis who
> revealed veda mantras. The actual persons fulfilled the prophecy of the
> Vedas by appearing and revealing what was already known.
In Adhyatma Ramayana, if I remember right, Sita asks, "Hey Rama! Have you
heard in any Ramayana that Rama left Sita behind in Ayodhya? You cannot do
something that has not been told already."
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list