[Advaita-l] dakSiNAmUrti stOtra from sUta saMhita

[V Subrahmanian]

I think you are concluding hastily.  I am not canvassing for this
'upanishad'.  I only informed the list about it.  You need not go on with
your tirade.

I have read the printed portions and noticed the 'akabar' part also.

subrahmanian.v

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan <
rama.balasubramanian at gmail.com> wrote:

> Here is part of the last verse transliterated. Make up your own mind.
>
> ilelAkabarho akabarha ilelAkabarho akabarha ilelAkabarho akabarha
> ilelAkabarho akabarha ilelAkabarho akabarha.h |
> akabarho.asmi akabarho.asmi akabarho.asmi akabarho.asmi ||
>
> Looks like someone decided to convert allaahuakbar into Sanskrit.
> Total nonsense, to say the least.
>
> I agree with Satish in his assessment (not sure I would put it that way
> :-))
>
> "have seen this upaniShad once and there is nothing Hindu about it. It
> does not matter who your "reliable source" on this matter is, even if
> this source is a sanyasi from the great shankara order, it does not
> matter, he deserves to be slapped hard for the above misinformation."
>
> Rama
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan
> <rama.balasubramanian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The Adyar Library does not shiShTAchAra make :-).
> >
> > I have seen that book - it's just a bunch of manuscripts collected by
> > the Adyar library.
> >
> > The so called upanishad repeatedly says ilale, hardly the iDA (or iLA)
> > of the veda is it? Is it even a Sanskrit word? And the fact that it is
> > called allA upaniShad? - cannot wash that away.
> >
> > Finally ends with ilelaakabarho - ilela-akabar no such word - does it
> > refer to akbar?!! What the heck, doesn't make any sense. Shakta
> > upanishad - come on :-)
> >
> > Rama
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:09 PM, V Subrahmanian
> > <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan <
> >>
> >>>
> >>> The example of Allah upanishad is irrelevant since shiShTAchara - not
> >>> just in advaita but everyone else - does not recognize Allah
> >>> upanishad.
> >>>
> >>> Sir,
> >>
> >> Recently I came across a book on the above Upanishad published by the
> Adyar
> >> Library, in 1933 edited by the Pundits of the Adyar Library under the
> >> supervision of Dr.Kunjan Rajah.  This 'upanishad' is listed no.5 of
> >> 'shaakta-upanishads'. It is very short and reads like a 'ghanam'
> >> recitation.
> >>
> >> This is just for information.
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >> subrahmanian.v
> >> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>