[Advaita-l] Ishwara Turiya?

[Ramesh Krishnamurthy]

On 9 March 2012 16:18, Rajaram Venkataramani <rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:
<< But the negation of  tatastha lakshana of Saguna Brahman does not
negate Saguna Brahman Himself. >>

The point is that saguNatvam itself is taTastha. Once all
visheSha-s/guNa-s are negated, only the nirvisheSha remains.

At the highest level, your expression "taTastha lakShaNa of saguNa
brahman" is self-contradictory.