[Advaita-l] Concluding stotra of "siddanta bindu"

[Venkata sriram P]

Namaste,
 
///
 
Sri.Madhusudana Saraswathi by his remarks has answered the critics 
who said that Veda vyasa has not written vedanta in his Brahma sutras
 
//
 
So, should i conclude with the idea of Sri Madhusudana that:
 
1) vyAsa's brahma sUtra doesn't clearly define advaita ?
 
2) vyAsa couldn't explain the vEdAnta as perfectly as sankara ?
 
3) Was vyAsa was less intelligent as compared to sankara ?
 
4) was it an arthavAda prayOga towards the sankara's brilliant commentary on sUtra so much so that it has outwitted even the original sUtra of vyAsa ?
 
5) Sankara filled the gaps by writing commentary and explained the siddhAnta which vyAsa couldn't do so ?
 
Why, Madhusdana has to devalue the vEda vyAsa who happens to be one of the chief acharya of advaita parampara by making a sweeping remark that vyAsa couldn't explain
the siddhAnta properly in his sutra?
 
regs,
sriram