[Advaita-l] concluding sloka of siddhAnta bindu

[Sunil Bhattacharjya]

Namaste,

I think Sama Vidhana Brahmana clearly says that Badarayana Vyasa is different from Vedavyasa. I think Adi Sankara did not equate Vedavyasa with Badarayana Vyasa. The confusion could have occurred later on. Kindly correct me if I am wrong.


Regards,
Sunil KB



________________________________
 From: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] concluding sloka of siddhAnta bindu
 

PraNAms
Actually the Brahmasuutras are by
Badarayana - the second chapter dismisses the Buddhist doctrines. Traditionally
our achaaryas have equated Badarayana with Veda Vyaasa. Apparently there were
several suutras before Badarayana suutras but many got last after Badarayana
suutras became prominent.I donot think authorship is different for the first four suutras compared to that of the rest of the suutras. Hari Om!
Sadananda
 


>________________________________
> From: Swami Sarvabhutananda <swami.sarvabhutananda at gmail.com>
>To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> 
>Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:14 AM
>Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] concluding sloka of siddhAnta bindu
>  
>
>OM
>BrahmasUtrA (ie) chatussUtri is from VEDA VYASA.
>It is in the form of sUtrAs and the bhAshyA is from ShankarA.
>    
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org