[Advaita-l] 'Ishwaro'ham' and 'IshwarabhAvaH'

[kuntimaddi sadananda]

PraNAms
God bless Shree Rajaramji. He gives  an opportunity for us all to dwell in Advaita philosophy and why one should have clear vision of absolute truth and shows how or why one should follow a sampradayik teacher to gain this understanding of advaita - shrotavyaH, mantavyaH and nidhidhyaasitavyaH. 
Hari Om!
Sadananda

From: Anil Aggarwal <aaggarwal at wi.rr.com>
>
>
>I agree
>ANIL AGGARWAL
>
>
>On Aug 30, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Namaste Sadaji,
>> 
>> I have one curiosity as to why we do not leave Rajaramji alone. I am sure had Adi Sankaracharya  been alive today he would have surely told us to leave him alone as he will never be able to understand the Advaita standpoint. It also does not matter to us if he thinks we do not understand his view point and if he thinks the principle of Advaita is wrong. We can probably tell him that "let us agree to disagree". If you think otherwise you may kindly tell me.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Sunil KB
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Rajaram Venkataramani <rajaramvenk at gmail.com>
>> To: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>; A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> 
>> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 2:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] 'Ishwaro'ham' and 'IshwarabhAvaH'
>> 
>> 
>> Do you accept eka jiva vada? According to that,no one is really liberated.
>> So, if you say there is no bhakti in mukti, I will say there is no mukti,
>> so only bhakti.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:50 PM, kuntimaddi sadananda <
>> kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> PraNAms - just to add to Subbuji's list
>>> 
>>> 5. Krishna says - such a jnaani is the highest bhakta.
>>> 
>>> Hari Om!
>>> Sadananda
>>> 
>>> From: V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>
>>>> Suffice it to say, nay, remind, that:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  1. In Advaita bhakti towards the saguNa Ishwara is not impossible
>>>>  2. A niguNa brahma jnani can have such bhakti
>>>>  3. The expression of such bhakti is possible ONLY till the end of
>>>>  jivanmukti for such a jnani who has devotion to a saguNa mUrti
>>>>  4. In (videha) mukti there is no bhakti.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>> 
>>> For assistance, contact:
>>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> 
>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> 
>> For assistance, contact:
>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> 
>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> 
>> For assistance, contact:
>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>_______________________________________________
>Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
>To unsubscribe or change your options:
>http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
>For assistance, contact:
>listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
>
>