[Advaita-l] Debate between Dwarka & Sumeru Shankaracharyas

[Sunil Bhattacharjya]

I think people close to the other Sankaracharyas should meet the respective Sankaracharyas to find a way out to prevent this murder / suicide.




________________________________
 From: Abhishek Madhyastha <abhishek046 at gmail.com>
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Debate between Dwarka & Sumeru Shankaracharyas
 
Its true that Mahaswami Chandrashekara Bharati played a crucial role
in the appointment of Bharati Krshna Tirtha Maharaj. Likewise, it
should also be noted that Abhinava Vidyatirtha Mahaswami did try to
end the succession dispute of the Jyotir peetham. However, the
situation just wouldn't change! Nobody wished to compromise. Until
this issue is solved, these type of disputes will keep on arising.
Amidst all this, its only saddening to note that two Shankaracharyas
are fighting in such a fashion & the media is watching like a bunch of
hawks. Just look @ the caption given in the start of the article!

On 1/1/13, Sarma KV <sarmakv at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Abhishek,
>
> Due to the haloed unbroken jagadguru parampara at Sri Sharada peeTham,
> history is replete with incidents where the whole of advaita dharma world
> including the 4 AmnAya peeTham-s looked up to, sought and obtained guidance
> from Sringeri Jagadguru-s.
> Why else would the king of Nepal get guidance and blessings form Sri
> Chandrasekhara Bharati Mahaswamigal? Also, Sri Chandrasekhara Bharati
> Mahaswamigal played a crucial role in coronoation of Sri Bharati Krishna
> Teertha as Jagadguru of Sri Purushottama peeTham at Sri Jagannatha Puri
> (pUrvAmnAya peeTham.)
> It is a different matter whether Sringeri jagadguru-s vield absolute
> authority or not, but that they are capable of guiding has been almost like
> a tradition in the history of the AmnAya peeTham-s.
> Let's wait and see..
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Abhishek Madhyastha
> <abhishek046 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Sringeri Jagadguru is by no means has the absolute authority over all
>> Shankaracharyas. The Shankaracharyas of the 4 peethams function
>> independently. Unless asked for, it would be inappropriate for the
>> Sringeri Jagadguru to intervene in this matter. Moreover, the Sringeri
>> acharyas have been known to be unparallel & sages par excellence. Each
>> & every acharya in the parampara has truly lived up to the title of
>> "Jagadguru". The present acharya wouldn't compromise on such a great
>> parampara by indulging in such fights.
>>
>> On 1/1/13, Venkatesh Murthy <vmurthy36 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Namaste
>> >
>> > What money and wealth can a Sanyasi have? Nothing. Why are they
>> > fighting?
>> >
>> > Sringeri Swamiji must come forward and bring peace. He cannot sit idle
>> > when this is happening. It is a mistake if he cannot bring peace.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Rajaram Venkataramani
>> > <rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-12-25/allahabad/35999006_1_sangam-city-challenger-jal-samadhi
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If the news is untrue, sue TOI. If true, it is a simple matter of
>> getting
>> >> them both math officials booked under IPC for attempting and abetting
>> >> suicide. They are a disgrace to our tradition. They are interested in
>> >> wealth and control. Look at asking the loser to surrender wealth. If
>> they
>> >> have any courage, they should fight adharmic forces destroying our
>> >> tradition. That they don't do.
>> >>
>> >> That is why I support reason and truth over dogmatism.
>> >>
>> >> On Tuesday, January 1, 2013, Sunil Bhattacharjya wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Dear friends,
>> >>>
>> >>> Somebody should immediately try to persuade the Jagadgurus to become
>> >>> friends and to sort out their difference amicably and if necessary to
>> >>> learn
>> >>> from each other. Adi Sankaracharya defeated so many opponents but he
>> >>> never
>> >>> asked any opponent to commit suicide. I am sure the person who is
>> making
>> >>> "suicide" as a condition for the debate will appear to be a murderer
>> >>> in
>> >>> the
>> >>> eye of the Lord and  all knowledge and spiritual attainments of that
>> >>> person, if any, will go waste.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Sunil KB
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ________________________________
>> >>>  From: Abhishek Madhyastha <abhishek046 at gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> >>> To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <
>> >>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org <javascript:;>>
>> >>> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 9:54 AM
>> >>> Subject: [Advaita-l] Debate between Dwarka & Sumeru Shankaracharyas
>> >>>  made it a condition that the opponent would have to commit suicide.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://m.timesofindia.com/city/allahabad/Sangam-city-to-witness-battle-between-shankaracharyas/articleshow/17760205.cms
>> >>>
>> >>> Sadly, it has come to the point wherein the 2 Shankaracharyas are
>> >>> going to debate & the loser is supposed to give up his life by
>> >>> entering the Ganges! :-(
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> >>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> >>>
>> >>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> >>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> >>>
>> >>> For assistance, contact:
>> >>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org <javascript:;>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> >>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> >>>
>> >>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> >>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> >>>
>> >>> For assistance, contact:
>> >>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org <javascript:;>
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> >> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> >>
>> >> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> >> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> >>
>> >> For assistance, contact:
>> >> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > -Venkatesh
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> >
>> > For assistance, contact:
>> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>
>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>
>> For assistance, contact:
>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> नगुरोरधिकं नगुरोरधिकं नगुरोरधिकं नगुरोरधिकम्।
> शिवशासनतश्शिवशासनतः शिवशासनतश्शिवशासनतः ।।
>
> धन्योस्मि
> - श्यामसुन्दर शर्मा
> http://anantavaram.blogspot.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org