[Advaita-l] Interest Collection is Wrong according to Dharma?
V Subrahmanian
v.subrahmanian at gmail.com
Tue Jul 2 12:14:32 CDT 2013
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:46 PM, R Krishnamoorthy <srirudra at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dears
> To my knowledge there was no lending on interest in Vedic days.Borrowings
> were there but only confined to repayment of the principal or giving back
> the borrowed article.There is no equivalent word for interest in
> Samskrit.
I do not know if it is a derived term, but in the Apte English-Sanskrit
dictionary we have entries: ’interest: वृद्धिः, वार्द्धुष्यम्, 'simple
interest: सरलवृद्धिः, compound interest: चक्रवृद्धिः, ’interest at 5% =
पंचकेन शतेन, पंचकशतम्, पंचोत्तरं शतम् .
I think the Tamil and Kannada words 'vaDDi/baDDi' to denote interest have
their roots in the Sanskrit word 'vRddhiH' which means
'growth/multiplication' of money.
see also this page:
http://sabhlokcity.com/2012/08/notes-on-hindu-capitalism-continued-3/
regards
subrahmanian.v
Meadows Taylor tells us: "The laws of Manu disclose how thoroughly the
scheme of banking was known 3,000 years ago. The bankers understood and
followed the fluctuations of money value; they kept account-books,
day-books, and ledgers by single and double entry. They charged interest
simple and compound, they made insurance by sea and land, they granted
bills of exchange, and in short, they followed the practices of modern
times which are little changed from ancient rules." - See more at:
http://sabhlokcity.com/2012/08/notes-on-hindu-capitalism-continued-3/#sthash.rk7Hjv5T.dpuf
adows Taylor tells us: "The laws of Manu disclose how thoroughly the scheme
of banking was known 3,000 years ago. The bankers understood and followed
the fluctuations of money value; they kept account-books, day-books, and
ledgers by single and double entry. They charged interest simple and
compound, they made insurance by sea and land, they granted bills of
exchange, and in short, they followed the practices of modern times which
are little changed from ancient rules." - See more at:
http://sabhlokcity.com/2012/08/notes-on-hindu-capitalism-continued-3/#sthash.rk7Hjv5T.dpuf
Meadows Taylor tells us: "The laws of Manu disclose how thoroughly the
scheme of banking was known 3,000 years ago. The bankers understood and
followed the fluctuations of money value; they kept account-books,
day-books, and ledgers by single and double entry. They charged interest
simple and compound, they made insurance by sea and land, they granted
bills of exchange, and in short, they followed the practices of modern
times which are little changed from ancient rules." - See more at:
http://sabhlokcity.com/2012/08/notes-on-hindu-capitalism-continued-3/#sthash.rk7Hjv5T.dpuf
> Aparadham was there if some promise is not fulfilled.But no
> percentage on principal amount.I may be corrected.R.Krishnamoorthy.
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Siva Senani Nori <sivasenani at yahoo.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I recently proof-read a book on Dharmasastra called Katyayanamatasangraha
> > dealing with litigation (व्यवहार) - and it cites many examples of
> interest
> > taking. There are rules as to when simple interest should be charged, and
> > when compounding should be resorted to. Oftentimes 5% per month is
> > prescribed as the interest that should be charged when whatever ought to
> be
> > done (within a certain time) is not done. I am not giving references
> > because they are too many and the assertion that interest-charging was
> both
> > common and well-discussed in Dharmasastra works is usually not contested
> > (and also because I do not have much time at hand presently).
> >
> > Then, there is the modern dictum that one ought to never belittle anybody
> > from the wife's side, deservedly or undeservedly, if one wants peace. I
> > believe this is the more forceful principle :-).
> >
> > Regards
> > N. Siva Senani
> >
> >
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: Venkatesh Murthy <vmurthy36 at gmail.com>
> > >To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <
> > advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, 2 July 2013 8:42 PM
> > >Subject: [Advaita-l] Interest Collection is Wrong according to Dharma?
> > >
> > >
> > >Namaste
> > >
> > >Book Micro economic Theory by Walter Nicholson page 9 -
> > >
> > >'For example, St. Thomas Aquinas believed value to be divinely
> determined.
> > >Since
> > >prices were set by humans, it was possible for the price of a commodity
> to
> > >differ
> > >from its value. A person accused of charging a price in excess of a
> good’s
> > >value was
> > >guilty of charging an “unjust” price. For example, St. Thomas believed
> the
> > >“just”
> > >rate of interest to be zero.'
> > >
> > >In Muslim religion also they say you should not charge any interest for
> > >loans.
> > >
> > >Like this is there any Dharma Sastra rule in Hinduism for charging
> > interest
> > >on loans?
> > >
> > >
> > >My wife's cousin's grand father was very religious Brahmin but he was
> > money
> > >lender. He was charging heavy interest to all people.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Regards
> > >
> > >-Venkatesh
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > >http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> > >
> > >To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > >http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> > >
> > >For assistance, contact:
> > >listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list