[Advaita-l] Eternal Loka

[Keshava PRASAD Halemane]

Thank you Sri Subrahmanian-ji for the explanation about the case of jaya-vijaya.

From the purely advaitic view point, when saguNa-brahman 'itself' has only a relative-reality, meaning that it applies to vishNu whose abode is vaikunTha that we are talking about, naturally the question of the others in vaikunTha cannot be any better than just be of relative-reality. 
So the explanation has to be to create more and more conceptual details in order to appease the ever-hungry intellect.

[sorry, i am reminded about Sri Madathil's point of not intending to get into a long discussion on this small point]! 

Thanks again.
KpH


________________________________
 From: V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>
To: rajaramvenk at gmail.com; A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> 
Cc: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> 
Sent: Saturday, 20 July 2013 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Eternal Loka
 

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 4:57 AM, <rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Namaskaram. There are  sastras that talk about eternal loka. How do
> advaita acharyas deal with that?
>

Pl. cite those shastras with accurate reference/text, etc. and we shall see
how they can be treated in advaita.

And with regard to Shri Keshava's question, the dvaitins hold that there
are two vaikunthas: one lower and the other higher: prAkRta and aprAkRta (I
think that is the distinction, though Vishishtadvaitins have kArana and
kArya vaikinthas)  The vaikunta from where jaya vijaya returned is the
lower one.  That is the explanation they give.  But HH Sri Chandrashekhara
Bharati Swamiji of Sringeri, while referring to non-advaitic moksha has
cited the jaya-vijaya case as one where there is no abolute mukti but only
relative, if any loka-prApti is admitted as mukti by various  schools.

regards
vs

> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:03:25
> To: rajaramvenk at gmail.com<rajaramvenk at gmail.com>; A discussion group for
> Advaita Vedanta<advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> Reply-To: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Eternal Loka
>
> Rajaram - PraNAms
> I feel there is a mixing up of the concepts of  other matas with advatic
> doctrine.
>
> From the vishiShTaadvaita point these are matter, made of pure satva only
> - a jiiva also get saatvic body when he takes a dip in the river (I think
> it is called sarayu) and gets welcome by the mother of all, Lakshmi Devi
> who is happy to see her son coming back and dresses up the jiiva (like
> prodigal son who has come back) and presents him to the father. These are
> all projections of the vaishnava Tradition which believes that Vaikunta is
> moksha. Vyaavahaara is there from their point since jiiva's role is to
> serve the Lord all the time.
>
> Let us not get mixed up with adviatic doctrinal position that you are
> asking. Paaramaarthika, vyaavahaarika and praatibhaasika divisions are
> mostly from advaita position.
> From advaita as I mentioned within vyavahaara there are only 14 lokas
> highest being satya loka. One can go up to that and return or evolve
> further by karma mukti.
> Other than that there is no vaikunta or kailaasa as per advaita.
> There is no point in mixing up these doctrinal positions and get confused.
> Any way this is my view.
> Hari Om!
> Sadananda
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: "rajaramvenk at gmail.com" <rajaramvenk at gmail.com>
> >To: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>; A discussion group
> for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> >Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 4:51 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Eternal Loka
> >
> >
> >Namaskarams. If Vaikuntha and Kailasa are not bautika, then what are they
> made of? Also, if they are not in vyavahara realm, how is vyavaharam
> possible in these lokas? My original question was whether vaikuntha and
> kailasa are eternal lokas in vyavahara realm but from what you say they
> seem to be paramarthika as per advaita though different to advaita siddhi.
> Is that a correct understanding of your view? If so, how can that be true
> as only advaita siddhi is paramarthika?
> >Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
> >Sender: "Advaita-l" <advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> >Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:35:35
> >To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta<
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> >Reply-To: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>,
> >A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
> ><advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> >Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Eternal Loka
> >
> >Shree Rajaram - PraNAms. You should know too, if I may say so. Vaikunta
> and kailasa do not come under the Bhoutika prapancha that consists of 14
> lokas. In the krama mukti the highest is satya loka where jiiva either come
> back to the earth or gets Vedantic knowledge from Brahmaji and gets
> liberated at the end of that loka.
> >
> >Vaikunta and Kailaasa are supposed to be where mukta jiivas go, and
> therefore do not come under vyaavahaarika lokas as per Advaita. As
> per vishishTaadvaita, for example - they are lokas where there is no return
> back since they are liberated even though they will be transacting with
> each other and also serving the Lord, while enjoying infinite happiness.
> >
> >Advaita does not accept such mukti where duality persists; and since they
> are not part of the 14 lokas of the bhoutika prapanca they are not accepted
> in that category also.  udaramantaram kurute athathasya bhayam bhavati -
> even a spec of difference will cause fear and therefore samsara, and hence
> as per advaita there is no freedom from samsara even in VaikunTa. Such
> conditioned freedom is not accepted by Advaita even under karma mukti also.
> >Just my 2c.
> >Hari Om!
> >Sadananda
> >_______________________________________________
> >Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> >http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> >To unsubscribe or change your options:
> >http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> >For assistance, contact:
> >listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org