[Advaita-l] Mandana Mishra

Venkatesh Murthy vmurthy36 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 01:43:31 CDT 2013


Sri Subhanu Saxena said there is a separation of Avidya Upadana argument
and Adhyaropa Apavada. Where he said the two arguments are opposing? How
Avidya Upadana can be opposite of Adi Sankara Mata? We should not make
conclusions in hurry.

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> brahmakāṇda page 26 direct reference to a separate school that is
> Shankara's:tathāparaih "adhyāropāpavādābhyām niṣprapancham
> prapanchyate"And so say others "that which is beyond the manifested is
> made manifest by the method of false attribution and retraction"You can
> see here a very early direct separation of the school of Shankara and the
> school that later become known as vivaraṇam
> praNAms Sri Subhanu prabhuji
> Hare Krishna
> Thanks a lot for quoting these references from brahmasiddhi.  It is really
> regrettable that later vvAkhyAnakAra-s have opted for the alternative /
> oppsosite method of shankara siddhAnta.  It is clear that at the time of
> origination of brahmasiddhi itself there were two divergent view points
> and out of those two view points one view point which is propagating the
> avidyOpAdAnakAraNa  is quite opposed to shankara's advaita view point.
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list