[Advaita-l] Who Slept Very Well? - Part IV
Bhaskar YR
bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com
Tue Feb 25 02:09:18 CST 2014
So, what was the outcome of 1960's debate?
praNAms
Hare Krishna
Not known exactly :-)) according to one small book let ( which Sri
chandramouLi prabhuji sent to me) it was kAryAlaya pundit (Sri vittala
shAstri) accepted his defeat and did not rise any further question on
mUlAvidyA, kAraNAvidya or bhAva rUpa avidyA in sushupti. So shrungeri
pundits (Sri Ramachandra shAstri etc.) are victorious :-)) There is one
more subsequent book after this debate (title : mUlAvidyA vimarsheya
vimarshe in Kannada) which denies this claim and that book has been
written by the same Sri vittala shAstri (later in sanyAsAshrama - Sri
jnAnAnandendra saraswati) hints that there was almost acceptance of
non-existence of mUlAvidyA in shankara bhAshya by then shrungeri
jagadguru HH Sri abhinava vidyA teertha swamiji :-)) Credentials of both
of these works god only knows :-))
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list