[Advaita-l] asti bhAti priyaM in Drg-drsya viveka

[Durga Janaswamy]

Hari Om,
Namaste.

Asti, jaDa (जड), is an object, being indriya grAhya, so asti is object of my consciousness. 
Bhāti is not an object, it being not indriya grAhya, so bhāti cannot be an object of my consciousness.

thanks and regards
-- durga prasad 

________________________________
> Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 10:18:22 +0530 
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] asti bhAti priyaM in Drg-drsya viveka 
> From: v.subrahmanian at gmail.com 
> To: janaswamy2001 at hotmail.com; advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org 
>  
>  
>  
> 2015-08-15 10:06 GMT+05:30 Durga Janaswamy via Advaita-l  
> <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org<mailto:advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>>: 
> Hari Om, 
>  
> Namaste. 
>  
> अस्ति भाति प्रियं रुपं नमचेत्यंसपंचकम्     अंशपञ्चकम् 
>  
> आद्यत्रयं ब्रह्म रुपं जगद् रुपं ततो द्वयम् 
> (ड्र्ग्-द्र्स्य विवेक) 
>  
> asti bhAti priyaM rupaM nama chetyaMsa paMchakam 
> AdyatrayaM brahma rupaM jagad rupaM tato dvayam 
> (Drg-drsya viveka) 
>  
>  
> We know that chaitanyaM (चैतन्यं ) is not  indriya grAhya (इन्द्रिय ग्राह्य). 
>  
> Then how does bhAti (in the verse) is explained? 
>  
> It is the 'shine' that is there in every object which is revealed by  
> its becoming an object of knowledge for me. Asti gives the mere  
> 'existence'.  Bhāti is its becoming an object for my consciousness.  
>   'Ghaṭo'sti, ghaṭaḥ sphurati' brings out the difference between  
> existence and shine.  In Satyam Jnanam Anantam Brahma, the first is  
> asti and the second is bhāti. 
>  
> regards 
> vs 
>  
>  
> Thank you and regards 
> -- durga prasad 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/ 
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita 
>  
> To unsubscribe or change your options: 
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l 
>  
> For assistance, contact: 
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org<mailto:listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org> 
>