[Advaita-l] Shankara and Madhusudana

[Vivek]

Hari Om,

Thanks for sharing that.

To take this one step further. Which are the commentaries really worth studying on Gita beside these two?



> On Jul 5, 2015, at 12:03 AM, Venkata sriram P <venkatasriramp at yahoo.in> wrote:
> 
> Namaste,
> 
> /////
> 
> Shankara Bhasya and Madhusūdana Sarasvatī's  
> commentary differ from each other on Bhagavad Gita
> 
> //
> 
> "Differ" is a objectionable word to use.  The very first sentence of gUDArthadIpikA says:
> 
> // bhagavatpAda bhASyArthaM AlOchyAtiprayatnataH prAyaH pratipadaM
> kurvE gItAgUDArthadIpikAM //
> 
> After deeply and thoroughly studying the shankara bhASya, I am proceeding forth
> to comment on the bhASya called gUDArtha-dIpikA.  The name itself suggests 
> that it illumines the hidden secrets of shankara bhASya.  
> 
> So, it is very much in line with shankara sampradAya.  
> 
> regs,
> sriram 
>