[Advaita-l] akdhandaakara vRitti - My mistake

[Keshava PRASAD Halemane]

namastE. praNaams My Dear  श्रीमल्ललितालालितः 
Yes, i have re-read your earlier post from the advaita-L archives - i am placing here that URLs for those who may wish to read it again: [Advaita-l] Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti

|   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| [Advaita-l] Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti[Advaita-l] Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti श्रीमल्ललितालालितः lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com Thu Jun 18 00:25:03 CDT 2015  |
|  |
| View on www.advaita-vedanta.org | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

[Advaita-l] Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti

|   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| [Advaita-l] Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti[Advaita-l] Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti श्रीमल्ललितालालितः lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com Thu Jun 18 11:02:34 CDT 2015  |
|  |
| View on www.advaita-vedanta.org | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

Now a question: Is it possible for one to have an  akhaNDAkAra-vRtti [niShprakAra-vRtti] associated with an object in the physical world, say a ghaTa or a paTa like object? OR is it that  an  akhaNDAkAra-vRtti [niShprakAra-vRtti] is by definition always associated with only brahma-vastu?  
Keshava PRASAD HalemanemOkShakaamaarthadharmahjanmanaa jaayatE jantuḥ |  samskaaraat hi bhavEt dvijaḥ ||  vEda-paaThaat bhavEt vipra |  brahma jnaanaat hi braahmaNah || 


     On Sunday, 5 July 2015 3:43 PM, श्रीमल्ललितालालितः via Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
   ​
For Keshav,
I've to say that I've read your posts and they are difficult to understand.
In clear words, they are not close to my understanding. However, the anvaya
of akhaNDa to AkAra and Akara to vRtti is correct, if I must make a remark.
If you read my post in original thread I've given definition of AkAra. That
may help you.