[Advaita-l] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Difficulty with Akhandakara Vrtti

[Ravi Kiran]

Namaste

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:22 PM, H S Chandramouli via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

 I had interpreted the term “ akhanda “ not in the sense of “
> infinity “ , but in the sense of “ partless “ as opposed to “ khanda “
> jnana ( knowledge with parts ). Details are available in the thread itself.
>
>
>
If we consider,

"akhanda" in the sense of "partless" (unitary knowledge of Brahman)

or

the akhaNDAkAratva or niShprakAratva or brahmAkAra of vRttiH as without any
objective qualities, dispelling ignorance of Brahman

I would understand, they will culminate to give the same meaning or
tAtparya is same ( the difference is in the prakriyA used )

Thanks


>