[Advaita-l] Why can't it be done by some learned scholars?

[Srivathsa Rao]

Sir,

 I am not telling to kill chatur varnashrama,to tell in better worlds,I
want to unite brahmins....In brahmins there are three sects...smarthas
,madhvas and sri vaishnavas...I want to bring all of them under single
platform......

Brahmins are the backbone of sanathana dharma ,if we unite them the unity
among hindus will automatically comes....

At present there is no unity among brahmins ,to bring unity among brahmins
there is need to bring them under single platform..
As unity among different sects will be always not as good as unity among
single sect as homogeneous unity will always better than heterogeneous
unity...

Now when there is any injustice to brahmins there comes heterogeneous unity
,but after a while this unity will die soon , as it is heterogeneous...but
homogeneous  unity is not like that it lasts till end...

Also some brahmins think if there is injustice to other sect or other sect
brahmin ,it is good let it happen...this type of jealous will die ...if
there is single dharma among brahmins

You have asked by killing dvaita and vishistadvaita weather we are not
killing creativity of hindu religion...for that my answer is..this newly
formed religions are not there in shankaracharya's time,,these are the
product of the new acharya's thinking way and these religion looks so
childish....

This athma's concept is not up to some one's thinking capacity that is why
vedas are considered as apourusheya...that is why vedas and its hidden
meanings has to be learnt from good lineage of guru paramapara.....

This athman's concept is beyond this bhudhi as said by upanishads only
...so ,we have to learn it from a proper guruparampara only not from some
intellectual brilliant...which will be mostly wrong..as we can easily see
in dvaita and vishistadvaita

Shakara's advaita has a lineage from goudapadacharya who was a advaithi,but
dvaita was not there before madhva,his teacher achutha preksha was
aadvaithi...similarly ramauja's guru was aadvaithi......

Always old is gold.....


On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:47 AM, V Subrahmanian via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Santosh Rao via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> > NamaskR,
> >
> > What were these 72 sects? it is my understanding that sankaracharyas
> > philosophical opponents were mainly buddhists, jains, and mimamsikas not
> > muslims. Is this incorrect?
> >
>
> In this URL containing the Anandagiriya Shankara vijaya, on pdf p.12
> onwards you can see a list of schools that are refuted. One can count at
> the most 50 there.
>
> >
> > What is the answer to the assertion that advaita vedanta is a
> philosophical
> > "compromise" with buddhism? Does this claim hold water?
> >
>
> You can read a six-part series of articles on the topic: Buddhism, Advaita
> and Dvaita published in this forum.  For the first part here is the URL:
>
> http://www.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/2011-May/027302.html
>
> You can locate the other parts too by suitably searching.
>
> regards
> subrahmanian.v
>
>
> > This is just myth.
> > 'Removed 72 sects'?? From where??
> > All minds?? Even most loyal of those sects?? Even from future minds??
> >
> > I don't think that just because there is a philosophy known as Vedanta,
> > people will not convert. If it were true no one would have converted at
> any
> > time.
> >
> > It's man who decides what he wants to follow, right or wrong. Who gives
> > even a single thought to validity of philosophy and arguments? Only a
> few.
> > So, only they don't convert because there is a philosophy and they can
> > understand that. It's not applicable to masses.
> >
> > Debates are always going on among sects mentioned by you. But, it is not
> to
> > convert essentially.
> > The argument which you think correct is flawed in other's view. So, it
> > didn't prove your philosophy correct to him. So, he doesn't leave his
> sect.
> > Another thing, most debates are to show that they have studied their
> > respective works and retain that. Some debates are to win prizes. So, the
> > result you are expecting can't come from those debates.
> >
> > Do you think that mAdhva-s and shrI-vaiShNava-s are avaidika in every
> > sense?
> > No, it is not like that. They follow veda-s. They are already in home.
> And,
> > what veda-s want to say is debatable.
> > So, stop being biased and forcing your thoughts on others.
> > On Mar 29, 2015 7:03 PM, "Srivathsa Rao via Advaita-l" <
> > advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Before 1200 years there came shankaracharya  who removed 72 sects in
> > > ancient sathana dharma and brought them under a single platform of
> > advaita
> > > vedanta,that is why ancient sanathana dharma is still present in india
> > > otherwise we would have been muslim by now.
> > >
> > > The present day science even support advaita vedanta.Now my point is
> why
> > > can't some learned scholars can bring back madhvas and srivishnavas and
> > > newly formed mathas under advaita vedanta by proper debate under
> > upanishad.
> > >
> > > This will even support Rss 's Ghar Vapsi Right?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> > >
> > > For assistance, contact:
> > > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>