[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??

[H S Chandramouli]

>
> Sri Sadananda Ji,
>
>
>
> Pranams.
>
>
>
> Reg  << However even gold transforming involves vivarta only -
> vaachaarambhanam vikaaro naamadheyam - Gold remains as gold when ring,
> bangle etc form - It is transformation-less transformation.
>
> Ring becoming bangle is pariNAma - in this case we are not taking about
> gold - one form transforms into another by pariNAma. This applies also for
> jagat when tree transforms into table and chair, etc. Ontological status of
> gold and ornaments are different - hence vivarta. The ontological status of
> ring, bangle etc are same hence one transforming into other is pariNAma only
> .>>,
>
>
>
> I think we have to be satisfied with agreeing  to disagree.
>
>
>
> Pranams and Regards
>
>
>
>