[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??

[H S Chandramouli]

>
> Sri Bhaskar Ji,
>
>
>
> Pranams.
>
>
>
> Reg  << All of a sudden from where did you get the mithyA word to denote
> the non-contradiction of pratyaksha pramANa!!??  >>.
>
>
>
>  You wrote on 23 March   in response to Sri Venakatraghavan Ji
>
>
>
> <<  As you know one pramANa will never contradict other pramANa.  And now
> the
> > important question is :  why at all the names and forms of this
> > multifarious jagat to be declared as mithya (when it is pratyaksha
> pramANa
> > siddha ) to realize the Agama pramANita ekatvaM of brahman?? >>.
>
>
>
> I interpreted this statement as meaning that in your view
>
>
>
> 1. jagat is wrongly declared as mithya even when it is pratyaksha pramANa
> sidha
>
>
>
> 2. That this is declared so only to realize the Agama pramANita ekatvaM of
> Brahman.
>
>
>
> 3. Such a judgement is arrived at even ignoring the fact that it results
> in contradiction of two pramANas.
>
>
>
> My response was based on such an understanding.
>
>
>
> Regards
>