[Advaita-l] Fwd: Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??

Venkatesh Murthy (वेङ्कटेशः सीतारामार्यपुत्रः) vmurthy36 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 21 22:57:16 CDT 2016


In the Vivekacudamani it is said 'Sabdajaalam Mahaaranyam
Cittabhramanakaaranam'. We can see it is exactly happening here in
this discussion. People have made huge number of posts and created a
huge network. But this network is a big forest of words and it is
creating confusion only in the mind.

Simple sentence Brahma Satyam Jagan Mithya Jeevo Brahmaiva Naparaha is
causing so much confusion? Some people are following a bad rule 'If
you cant convince them confuse them'. This is a bad way of discussing.
Kindly do not confuse others because you cannot convince them.

> If you say samskAra is anAdi and never originated, then it is equivalent in
> saying such samskAra is self-same nature of the jIva, and hence never get
> rid of it, and hence never is Brahman to begin with.>



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list