[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??

Durga Prasad Janaswamy janaswami at gmail.com
Fri Apr 22 21:57:05 CDT 2016

Hari Om,


Brahma and Jagat

One Mahatma said:

bAdhAyAM sAmAnAdhikaraNyam (बाधायां सामानाधिकरण्यम्) is necessary for a
seeker during ignorance stage. bAdhAyAM sAmAnAdhikaraNyam talks about
neti-neti,  there is no serpent but only rope etc.

When ignorance is gone,  a tattvaGYa does not need  bAdhAyAM
sAmAnAdhikaraNyam. For a tattvaGYa, sarva shabda - aikya sAmAnAdhikaraNyam
only.   The pot-space is the same as the total space. What is jewelry? Gold.
brahmaivedam sarvam.

-- durga prasad

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Praveen R. Bhat via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Namaste Bhaskarji,
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
> > Ø   I mentioned SDS school of thought just to address the prabhuji-s who
> > are closely following the teachings of Sri SDS & Swamy paramArthAnanda,
> not
> > to  offend anyone and no intention of drive away the traditional teaching
> > of shankara from them.  When I have been addressed as  ‘Mattur prakriya’
> > follower just because I was following Sri SSS’s teaching, I was not
> > offended nor thought that ‘Mattur prakriya’ is something different from
> > shankara’s prasthAna traya prakriya.
> >
> As I said, it was FYI, out of my respect for Pujya Swamiji, and I have no
> reason to take offence.
> > So, it’s all depend on how you read these lines and between the lines J
> >
> There was only reading the line, nothing in between. Pujya Swamiji didn't
> like the usage "school of thought" for Vedanta, since he said it is the
> truth. I thought you and/ or may be others would like to know.
> By the way, though not directly relevant to this thread, just curious to
> > know your clarification with regard to traditional stand on VC Vs
> > questioning and doubting of same prakaraNa grantha with regard to
> contents
> > and authorship from Arsha Vidya followers (for example previously Dr.
> > Michael Comans & in ashrama Sri VasudevaachArya) .  Which approach you
> > think more traditional and authentic?
> >
> Not that I would like to comment even if I knew what you're talking about,
> but I do not know what their respective stands are. Still, if you would
> like to know, Vivekachudamani is taught in the Gurukulam, and Pujya Swamiji
> has written a book on selected verses. This is also just FYI.
> > PS: its not pUrNamadaM, its pUrNamadAH or pUrNamidaM.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ø     Thanks for the correction…but we chant this mantra pUrNamadaH
> > pUrNamidaM etc. an elongated ‘A’ in pUrNamadAH as you have written above,
> > would force me to chant deergha to the ‘da’.  That is my way of reading
> the
> > transliterated Sanskrit words J
> >
> Yes thanks, that deergha A should be hrasva as pUrNamadaH, a typo, due to
> what is called a sticky key, which sticks on between adjacent letters.
> Anyway, I commented on it because I saw you use it earlier also and thought
> that you're not the one to use wrong words; so I marked a PS to point out
> an oversight.
> > Anyway, I am not so good at transliterated writing nevertheless I write
> it
> > without any fear coz. I know prabhuji-s like you would always be eager to
> > pick these mistakes and  correct it J
> >
> Oh, not at all, you are quite good at it, especially since you have trouble
> with devanagari fonts on your PC. Far from being eager to use, let alone
> correct, I have discomfort reading transliterations myself. :)
> Apologies to all for digressing from the thread subject.
> praNAm,
> --praveen
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org

More information about the Advaita-l mailing list