[Advaita-l] Is study of Vedanta necessary?

[Nithin Sridhar]

Sadananda ji,

In my opinion, it truly depends on the individual and his spiritual
competancies.

Regards.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
This
email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:17 PM, kuntimaddi sadananda via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

>
> PraNAms
>
> I am crystallizing the questions in short form
>
> 1. Is Vedanta necessary
>
> 2. Is Vedanta necessary and sufficient
>
> 3. Is Vedanta necessary but not sufficient - if so what-else is needed?
>
> Hari Om!
> Sada
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Mon, 2/1/16, kuntimaddi sadananda via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
>  Subject: [Advaita-l] Is study of Vedanta necessary?
>  To: "yahoogroups" <advaitin at yahoogroups.com>, "adviata-l" <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
>  Date: Monday, February 1, 2016, 5:53 AM
>
>  PraNAms to all
>
>  Question – Is intensive study of Vedanta essential for
>  self-realization? Is not sufficient to have the faith that I
>  am conscious-existent entity which is unchanging and I am
>  not this body-mind and intellect which are continuously
>  changing.   I am the essence of this universe
>  since without I (not BMI) the very existence of the universe
>  cannot be established.
>
>  2. Does one need a faith that Vedanta is apourusheyam, etc.
>
>
>  3. If one sees everything is nothing but the Lord – yo
>  maam pasyati sarvatra sarvanca mayi pasyati – One who sees
>  Me everywhere and everything in Me  ; This comes
>  immediately after  sarva bhuutastam aatmaanam sarva
>  bhuutanica aatmani-One who sees self in all and in
>  oneself.  Both statements seem to be equivalent.
>  Interestingly the statement that involves Bhakti comes after
>  the statement that involves Janaanam- although both appear
>  to indicate the same.
>
>  4. What are your thoughts on these?
>
>  Hari Om!
>  Sada
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>  http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
>  To unsubscribe or change your options:
>  http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
>  For assistance, contact:
>  listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>



-- 
Nithin S,
Staff-Writer,
http://www.newsgram.com