[Advaita-l] Shankara and DrishTi-SrishTi vAda - eka jeeva vaada

[Venkatraghavan S]

No, I am saying the hInatva adjective you add to jeeva is also your
adhyAropa, not mine. So if you think I am belittling vedA by making a hIna
jIva perform apparent srishti, that is because *you* are superimposing
hInatva, *not me*.

In reality I hold no creation to have happened. However, even in avidyA
dasha, when we talk of apparent creation, hInatva of the jIva is only an
imagination, not fact.

Regards
Venkatraghavan
On 12 May 2016 11:47 a.m., "Bhaskar YR" <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> Sorry, I don't consider the jIva to be heena at all. He is sAkshAt Brahman.
>
> praNAms
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Oh!! if you are saying this srushti is from sAkshAt parabrahMan I don’t
> have any issues but only agreements J
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>
> *From:* Venkatraghavan S [mailto:agnimile at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2016 3:33 PM
> *To:* Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com>
> *Cc:* A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>; Anand Hudli <anandhudli at hotmail.com>
> *Subject:* RE: [Advaita-l] Shankara and DrishTi-SrishTi vAda - eka jeeva
> vaada
>
>
>
> Sri Bhaskar,
> >
> > >  parasmAccha brahmaNaH pANAdikaM jagat jAyate iti vedAntAmaryAda says
> bhAshyakAra in sUtra bhAshya.  Without giving any importance to
> bhAshyakAra's verdict,  if we say this jagat is parichinna, avidyA
> paripUrNa, heena jeeva's imagination, we are undoubtedly insulting &
> belittling the vedAnta maryAda.
>
> Sorry, I don't consider the jIva to be heena at all. He is sAkshAt Brahman.
>
> Regards
> Venkatraghavan
> >
> > Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> > bhaskar
> >
> >
>